Since March 2007, a 4 year Fisheries Partnership Agreement has been in effect between Morocco and the European Union. The Agreement is highly unethical, since it opens for EU fisheries in the waters offshore occupied Western Sahara.
The EU is paying Morocco money to fish in waters under occupation. The FishElsewhere! campaign believes that this is both unethical and in violation of international law.
The 2007 EU-Moroccan Fisheries Agreement was from the very beginning considered highly problematic since the southern coordinates of the Agreement were not stipulated, leaving to Morocco how to interpret where the European vessels could fish.
According to the Agreement, fishing can take place in “the waters under the sovereignty or jurisdiction of the Kingdom of Morocco”.
Download the controversial EU-Moroccan Fisheries Partnership Agreement here [700 Mb].Morocco still illegally occupies Western Sahara, a territory stretching from the 27º 40’ N southwards. Western Sahara contains fish rich waters, and warnings that the EU-Moroccan agreement could be applied to waters within Western Sahara territory, were ignored. Upon signing the agreement, the EU refused to clearly demarcate the area of its application.
This has de facto opened for European fishing in Western Sahara waters – an area that is under Moroccan occupation.
The Fish Elsewhere! campaign believes that in such a politically sensitive case, the European Union could and should have explicitly precluded Western Sahara from the agreement; indeed this was the route taken by the United States government when signing the US-Morocco Free Trade Agreement in 2004 [Download]. Similar precisions have also been made by other governments in trade agreements. Not precluding Western Sahara has proven a serious mistake.
On April 9th 2008, one year after the Agreement started, and after 7 different written questions had been delivered to the European Commission, it was finally confirmed by the EU Commissioner for fisheries that fishing had indeed taken place also in occupied Western Sahara during the calendar year of 2007, under the EU-Moroccan Fisheries Partnership Agreement.
The fishing in Western Sahara is taking place in violation of international law, and clearly hindering the UN efforts to find a solution to the 30 year long occupation. The conflict is Africa’s longest-running, and is treated in the UN as an issue of decolonisation. The people of Western Sahara are either living under brutal suppression by Morocco, or in refugee camps in the Algerian desert.
Morocco is not recognised by the United Nations as the Administrative Power of this territory that it illegally controls, and is therefore not in the position to sell Western Sahara fish resources or give licences to the EU. Such an agreement further offers a sign of legitimisation to the untenable Moroccan occupation, and contributing to prolonging this conflict.
The lack of precision in the Agreement text was therefore highly criticised before the Agreement was ratified. The Swedish government voted against it, saying it was in violation of international law. 200 members of the European Parliament also voted against it.
The EU claims the agreement is perfectly legal, and chooses to look away from the clear ethical and political dilemmas of the deal. The EU bases its claims of legality on an opinion from the former UN Secretary General for Legal Affairs, ambassador Hans Corell.
The same former UN representative, however, says in a response that it would be in violation of international law to fish in Western Sahara under the current conditions, and that he does not understand how the EU can have misinterpreted his legal advice in this matter.
The current agreement is scheduled to terminate in March 2011. The FishElsewhere! campaign demands an immediate halt to fisheries in Western Sahara until an amendment be made in the agreement, excluding Western Saharan waters from its application.
The EU is paying Morocco to fish in occupied Western Sahara. The EU-Morocco Fisheries Agreement is both politically controversial and in violation of international law.
The international Fish Elsewhere! campaign demands the EU to cancel its highly unethical operations, and go fishing somewhere else. No fishing in Western Sahara should take place until the conflict is solved.
facebook
digg
reddit
del.icio.us
furl
